Saturday, March 28, 2020

LTUE Playing Evil Characters Panel



Probably every person who plays role-playing games (RPGs) at some point considers playing an evil character. The reasoning is likely because they want to play a character that has no limitations on the type of actions they can take. Before playing an anti-hero or villain in a game there are a number of considerations.

At the Life, The Universe and Everything Symposium (LTUE Website), I was on a panel covering some areas character players and game masters should consider before playing or having an evil character as part of their adventuring party.

The concept of having an alignment in terms of good versus evil is only in a few select, but well-known RPGs. Games without an assigned alignment to help guide a player still have the concept of evil being present. For the purpose of this discussion alignment was limited within the context of assigned limitations.

For all games, character action is a representation of a character's code of conduct or alignment more than the words written on the character sheet. I bring this up because I have seen players, through their character, perform amazingly evil acts and then claim they are not evil by pointing at their sheet. How to handle that is another, completely different discussion, but there might be some ideas you can take away from our panel discussion.

Motivations for Playing Evil Characters

Some players never consider playing an evil character, while others will push for the opportunity. Don't consider this to be anything bad about the player. RPGs are about exploring differences and that is one of the reasons players want to play evil, they can't be that way in real life. It is similar to playing a character of a different race, sex, physicality, skills, etc.

Sometimes players want to create chaos more than they want to be evil. In many cultures the chaotic individual is seen as being evil. In fantasy settings this is a major point of the Elric stories.

As a game master (GM) you have the right to put limitations on your game. If you don't want evil characters, don't allow them. I know GMs who have been running different campaigns for more than 20 years who don't allow evil characters. They've even pushed back on character actions and reminded the players that they are the heroes.

Character Motivations

Evil characters are harder to play than most people think they are. One of the first things to remember is a concept that is used in writing stories—the villain is the hero of their own story. This means they have motivations and characteristics like every hero. Their reasoning may be flawed, but they still see themselves as achieving something of greater good, not as the evil megalomaniac wanting to control the world just for the sake of power.

Characters can have the same motivation but see the path to accomplishing the goal differently. This is a prime difference between what is considered good and what is considered evil. Peace may be had by negotiating treaties or by killing all of one's adversaries. In many stories the evil lord is only trying to bring order and peace to their realm.

When wanting to play an evil character, you need to understand why they are evil, not just that they are evil. This will help define their motivations and how they will react. In reading novels, you will see where the evil characters are willing to let small victories go as they pursue their mission.


Pitfalls

Know what can be in store for you. I had two players who wanted to bring evil characters into an existing campaign. They thought it would be fun to disrupt the party from the inside. I tried to convince them it wasn't a good idea. They remained persistent after the warnings, so I allowed it. Their characters arrived outside the fort the party was helping to defend. They were allowed into the courtyard under strict guard and after a detection spell was cast were promptly slain. In games where evil can be identified, especially in settings where there is a strong storyline of two opposing sides, other players may be very willing to attack the evil characters before there is a chance for them to turn on the party.

Evil characters cannot act uncontrolled. I like to give a warning to players first looking at playing evil that they are not free to go through and kill everyone because they are simply evil. There should be consequences. If evil leaders killed on a whim followers or commoners that displeased them, they would soon be alone. If this was the common aspect of evil characters, every adventure in a tabletop of electronic RPG would be fighting only the final battle because the main boss would have already killed their minions. They have a plan and have enough underlings to sacrifice in the time of need. Player characters should have the same basic ideal of their fellow party members—the party is there to protect and keep them alive until they are no longer needed or become a hindrance.

Evil characters who are rash usually don't survive for long.

Final Thoughts

Playing evil can be enjoyable when done correctly.

Everyone on the panel had stories of games they had run or played in where an evil character provided a great storyline. One of the better ones was provided by Quiana Chase when she was running the DnD 5e Ravenloft adventure. It was a great example of how a single character willingly slipped deeper into an evil persona to achieve a greater goal they felt was for the better.

I have had the experience of playing a character who eventually became an assassin. During the campaign his best friend and comrade in battle was a paladin. They both embraced the aspects of being lawful and enforcing the laws and agreements made amongst the party and with others. Their tactics of enforcing the rules is where they differed.

If you have a desire to play an evil character, make sure your GM is willing to work with you. It is very important to keep a strong line of communication with them to make sure the character fits into the story you're building. Depending on the players, you may want them to know or not. Work that out with the GM also. I've always found that when you are keeping your motivations hidden from other players you should make sure you don't start doing something that others haven't seen. Gamers are quick to see a change and will cue on it, even if they don't intend to. For consideration, start passing notes to the GM early on and continue to do it. Don't pass the first note when you have defeated the enemy and you're preparing to divide the spoils.


Dancing in the Dark: How to Get the Most Out of Playing Evil Characters (from the program)

Evil characters can be fun and challenging to play but can cause both campaign and interparty issues. Are there solutions to these problems, or are they inherent in the type of play?

Other Panelists

Natalie Whipple

The author of fifteen novels, a pro gaming fan, a dungeon master, and perhaps the largest consumer of diet Mountain Dew Code Red on the planet. She graduated from BYU in English language with a minor in editing and is currently spending all her spare time being too extra for her D&D campaigns.

Quiana Chase

She creates simulations. She has helped produce large-scale simulations put on by Heroic Youth, Simulations Week, and others. Her jobs include working at the Lion's Gate space center, as an elementary school educator, and heading the Que Branch, which exclusively publishes work written by teens. Oh, and she writes novels. She also has a YA science fiction novel in the process of publication.

Jess Lindsay

She loves writing, theater, and making costumes. She takes turns running D&D campaigns with her regular group and takes her husband everywhere.

Ravvyn

They have been a nerdy creator all their life. They're something of a real life bard; they do a little bit of everything. They're a writer and game designer; they designed FUNdemental RPG, which is a d20-based TTRPG system. They stream regularly on Twitch with both TTRPG-based and variety streams. Additionally, they are a professional photographer and has done their fair share of cosplayand prop building as well. Their passion is bringing people together through art and games. patreon.com/TheRavynEvermore.

I'm working at keeping my material free of subscription charges by supplementing costs by being an Amazon Associate and having advertising appear. I earn a fee when people make purchases of qualified products from Amazon when they enter the site from a link on Guild Master Gaming and when people click on an ad. If you do either, thank you.

If you have a comment, suggestion, or critique please leave a comment here or send an email to guildmastergaming@gmail.com.

I have articles being published by others and you can find most of them on Guild Master Gaming on Facebookand Twitter(@GuildMstrGmng).


Creative Gaming Watch: Divinity: Original Sin 2

A rare non-Storium post here, but even if that has largely taken over the blog, I do still keep an eye on other forms of creative gaming!

One concept I've always been interested in is a game which merges, as much as possible, the ease of play of a video game and the creative power of a tabletop RPG. Not just a virtual tabletop, but something that actually played like a video game, but allowed someone to create and run their own adventures. There have been some attempts throughout the years - Neverwinter Nights, for instance, was a good shot at it, and Sword Coast Legends was a recent...not-quite-as-good shot at it. But nothing's quite gotten there for me - either there was too high of a barrier to entry for the GM for my tastes, or things were easier for the GM but fairly limited in power.

Obviously, that's quite a balancing act. But, fortunately, it hasn't stopped game companies from trying...and that brings me to today's subject, Divinity: Original Sin 2.

The first Divinity: Original Sin is quite a nice game, full of tabletop flavor and with an impressive amount of freedom for a video game - there are constraints, as one would expect since nobody can program for everything, but it definitely feels like you have more approaches to situations than in many other video game RPGs. I've found this particularly interesting in combat, where there seem to be all sorts of interesting tactical options that I can try to take advantage of and usually end up accidentally shocking and stunning my own guy, because I suck at tactical gameplay. The system's pretty brilliant, I'm less so.

Divinity: Original Sin 2 is building on that and adding new tactical options, and expanding the rest of the game besides...but it's also doing one more thing that has me very excited. It's adding a GM mode.

Like the mode in Sword Coast Legends, it appears this one is focused more on the concept of live GMing, rather than building a plot that can be played without a GM like Neverwinter Nights allowed. Not sure if that will be an option too or not. Regardless, the live GMing mode looks very promising in the previews I've seen so far. A few highlights:
  • It will be both providing a lot of prebuilt areas and allowing them to be built via some kind of modding package. This was a major early weakness of Sword Coast Legends, which only provided some prebuilts at first (I believe they did eventually add a toolset) - those only work for so long, so it's tough to build a full adventure. The combination of prebuilts and more extensive construction tools should allow a good mix of having what you need to grab at a moment's notice and being able to build something more detailed when needed.
  • It looks like it will, like Sword Coast Legends, allow some on-the-fly setup. Not sure on the extent yet, but this is one of the things that game got very right, so I'm pleased to see other companies exploring that idea. If you're used to GMing, you know for a fact that nothing ever goes exactly how you'd plotted it out. Having the ability to add characters, quests, areas, and the like during a session is pretty essential.
  • There's a GM override function, so if players want to do some tactic the game doesn't natively allow for, you can improvise and apply effects as you wish. That's just plain cool. One of the weaknesses of video games compared to tabletop gaming has always been that there's constraint over the options players have, to it's great to see that they've planned for ways around that.
  • The system itself is turn-based, which...I just always find works better for the tabletop atmosphere. A little more time to think, and more allowance for players to come up with unique tactics that way, too.
  • There's a "vignettes" feature that sounds excellent - a way of using images and text (they've compared it to PowerPoint) to convey parts of the story, and allow players to make choices. These sound like a great idea. Sometimes you really don't need to have a full, populated area for part of the story, but you still want to have a little more "pop" to it...this system should allow GMs to present stories in more freeform ways when needed. It looks very pen-and-paper, too.
  • This hasn't been confirmed to my knowledge, but Divinity: Original Sin had co-op for two players on a single console - I know the sequel is planning on expanding co-op in general to up to four, but haven't heard if they are going to have two or four players on the same console, or if that can interact with GM mode in any way. It'd be great if we could have the ability to run an adventure for a full party of players on only two computers, one for the GM and the other for the players, but that's probably wishful thinking. Still, it's a good dream.
We're still in the early going here and the mode isn't available for general tryout yet, but it looks promising. Here's hoping it goes well.

I'm less enthused by the character creation engine...specifically, for appearance. There's just not that many options at this point for those of us who really get into appearance creation, and I honestly don't know why games based on tabletop roleplaying don't ever go whole hog with character appearance creation the way things like Dynasty Warriors 8: Empires or Dragon's Dogma do, to say nothing of various WWE 2k wrestling games or the like. If any game type should let you truly put the character in your mind on to the screen, it's one with a strong tabletop gaming concept like this, but it never really happens. Here's hoping that they take another look at this at some point, but it seems pretty locked in now. Ah, well. If this GM mode works out, I'll be happy with that...and encourage them to take another look at appearance creation for Divinity: Original Sin 3.

Suzy Cube Update: April 20, 2018

#SuzyCube #gamedev #indiedev #madewithunity @NoodlecakeGames 
Finishing touches were the name of the game this week. As we begin to firm up dates internally, it's time to start locking things down. As such, this week was my last chance to fix niggling issues in levels.
Read more »

Monday, March 23, 2020

Far Cry 5






Minimum System Requirements


CPU: Intel Core i5-2400 | AMD FX-6300 @ 3.5 GHz or better
RAM: 8 GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows 10 (64-bit versions only)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | AMD R9 270 (2GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better)

Recommended System Requirements


CPU: Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.4 GHz | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.2 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 8 GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows 10 (64-bit versions only)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 or AMD R9 290X (4GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better)

Download The Game Here


Friday, March 20, 2020

TWO NEW RELEASES & A CRAZY GOOD MEMORIAL DAY SALE!

I am pleased to announce two new releases.

The limited edition 54mm (1:28 scale) Valkir Assault Trooper display model.
 
If you are a painter or a collector, this limited edition display model is for you.
Standing nearly 3" tall on the base, it will provide a wonderful canvas for you to showcase your skills.
 
This model is 1:28 (56mm) Scale
This kit includes a single Valkir Assault Trooper; a round 60mm base and two weapon choices. You can equip the trooper with an assault pistol or grenade launcher.
 
 
 MSRP $25.00

 
 
 


and the
 
 
15mm (1:100) scale Leviathan Capacitor Cooler.
 
 
This kit is NOT hot swap, you must choose to use this accessory at the time that you build the main kit.

15mm (1/100) scale Leviathan accessory, the Capacitor Cooler replaces the oil stacks on the back of the Leviathan Mortis and Crusader, allowing the machines a steadier flow of power but sacrificing the ability to overcharge the reactor.
 
MSRP $9.00
 
 
 
 
 
We also had a major restock on the 15mm scale Leviathan weapon arms....
 
 
 
 
Now on to the sale- Now until May 31st, select kits are up to 50% off!
 
I know... cray-cray right!?
 
When we took over distribution in October we took over the existing inventory for WGF, we were low on stock on some items and overstock on others. I have decided to equalize my stock levels and turn some of that into liquidity. Best way to do that is to move the overstock and pass a great deal to my customers.
 
I hope you enjoy the new releases and have a wonderful holiday!
 

Thursday, March 19, 2020

A Short Analysis About Gorogoa’s Puzzle Experience

Definitely, the most interesting and thought-provoking game I've played this year was Gorogoa. I experienced the awesome puzzles in the screen of Nintendo Switch and, wow, that was mesmerizing. I followed the whole gaming creative process in social media, but the gameplay surprised me in an epic level.



It's hard to describe the game in few words, but according to the definition from the official site, Gorogoa is "an ingenious, perfectly crafted puzzler". The game creator, Jason Roberts, developed thousands of meticulously detailed hand-drawn illustrations, encompassing the impressive scope of Gorogoa's personal narrative.



Essentially, in the gameplay, you control four quadrants where you must execute a series of zoom in and zoom outs in the images to recombine shapes and create new physical possibilities and structure new scenarios from the most improbable objects. The video below explains the game's main idea:



The great gameplay experience makes me want to write a personal short analysis of Gorogoa (for further consulting in classes) following a model proposed by Tracy Fullerton (2008) in her book Game design workshop.

• Players: single player game; one player against the puzzles
• Objectives: combine patterns to create and recreate scenarios/objects
• General rules: you can point and click in four different quadrants using zoom in and zoom out to connect new possibilities of images
• Resources: colorful images (hand drawn) with a fantasy theme disposed in four quadrants
• Conflicts: how good is your vision and imagination to solve the puzzles
• Limits: four quadrants with limited amount of zoom in/out possibilities
• Results: when you complete a puzzle correctly, the game shows you an animation and a new part of the scenario/narrative to point out your progress



Reference:

FULLERTON, Tracy, et al. Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008.

#GoGamers

A New Streak?

What's going on everyone!?


I've been doing some more packing and moving today and am glad to be relaxing here at home. 

Today for the #2019gameaday challenge I decided to play Star Realms because I just can't stay away, lol!

For a change I actually won the game I lost 2 nights ago and it seemed like I did it with ease!

As always, thank you for reading and don't forget to stop and smell the meeples! :)

-Tim

Oceanhorn 2: Knights Of The Lost Realm To Be Part Of Apple Arcade In Fall 2019



Hi all, a quick recap of the last few days – Oceanhorn 2: Knights of the Lost Realm will be part of Apple Arcade, and is confirmed in Fall 2019 for iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, and Mac. You can read more about Apple Arcade here. We'll share additional updates as we go.

We'd also like to take this opportunity to show you our brand new teaser trailer. Enjoy!


Sunday, March 15, 2020

Cooperative Games 10+ Years After Pandemic, LTUE Panel


Pandemic wasn't the first cooperative game to come along, but it was one of the first to gain broad recognition. At the 2020 Life, The Universe and Everything Symposium (LTUE Website), a group of us were asked to discuss cooperative games.

Each panelist had their own favorite cooperative game and some least favorites. To provide a common ground for discussion, we talked over concepts of what makes a cooperative game. With the framework provided, we then dug into this style of game and what problems can arise. We finished up by answering any questions from guests in the audience on what we would like to see in the future for cooperative games.

What are Cooperative Games?

Gamers agree on a basic definition of a cooperative game—the players are working together to defeat the challenge presented by the game. There are different styles of cooperative gaming that can change how the game is played.

There are games that introduce a traitor aspect from the beginning of the game. This style of play means there is someone is secretively working against the goals of all the other players. Cooperative games with a traitor have fans and detractors. Whichever you like playing is great, as long as everyone else sitting around the table is on the same page. Tales of consequences to players and gaming groups are told of when a traitor has been played particularly well, to the annoyance of the rest of the group.

A variant for some of these games is that a traitor may or may not be part of the game. Some of these are set up to provide a random element while others are a choice by the players. Some also require a player to take on the role of the traitor when a particular point of the game is reached.

There are more cooperative games coming out that allow for individual competition between the players along with the need to work together to defeat the game. In these cooperative/competitive games, the players have different goals they are working for in addition to achieving the group's victory. Most of the games I've seen that follow this pattern still require the group to work together to accomplish the goal, but there are multiple paths to be used and players are working to get the party to follow the one that would give them an advantage in the end. What I've seen in many of these is that it gives the players a way to see who "won" the game if the group succeeds. But if the board wins, the individual accomplishments don't count.

What Makes a Good Cooperative Game (and What Doesn't)?

Quarterbacking was an aspect not liked in most cases. Quarterbacking is when one player can take control of the game and dictate to everyone else what their actions should be. Cooperative games are designed to be more social in nature by having everyone discuss the actions. We had all been in games where one person either took control of the game, or control of another player's actions. This usually doesn't lead to a pleasant experience for the player that has been sidelined. One time when it was brought up as an advantage, is when the game is being played with younger players, or when teaching how a game is played. But even then, there was caution given that each player needs to be able to play their role in the game.

Definitive roles can be played by each player. It was agreed that one aspect of cooperative games that sets them apart is the character roles the players take. Each player having a distinct action that no other player is capable of. This requires the players to work together to accomplish the task. When all of the players are capable of taking the same action, there is nothing unique for the individual player and the action is just an aspect of creating a stronger party than the board. This uniqueness can be achieved by other means, but character personalities and individual roles are the most common.

What We Would Like to See ?

Everyone agreed they would like to see more cooperative games that give additional variants of play for the size of the gaming group. It is easy to say there is a solitaire version by having one player play all of the characters. That would just be quarterbacking the game without any other players. However, that wouldn't work very well for games that have a traitor built in or individual goals for the players to work toward.
Along with making more variants for existing cooperative games there are some competitive games that provide rules for cooperative play. It would be nice to have more games provide an experience for players who don't like to work against other players at the table.

Another aspect brought up would be a stronger cross with other tabletop games, like role playing games (RPGs). The strong narrative in most RPGs lends it to cooperative gaming. There are many genres and settings that would lend themselves easily to a cooperative gaming platform. On the flip side, it would be interesting to see a cooperative board game that allowed the players to develop individualized characters as in an RPG instead of choosing one of the pre-generated characters.

Final Thoughts

Cooperative games are a diverse group of games growing in size. There are players who really enjoy these games and others who don't like them at all. Every game is going to have people who are for and against them.

The complexity of the games range as much as other board games. Many of them are designed to scale so as you get better at playing the game you can make the game harder.

All of these give cooperative games a place. With gamers who are used to working together, and want to work together, a cooperative game can be a fulfilling event when you are able to overcome the obstacles of a hard fought challenge.

Cooperative Games 10+ Years After Pandemic (from the program)

Pandemic created a new type of board game with cooperative elements. How this has changed the world of board games and what does this mean today?

Other Panelists

Cavan Helps

He is the GM on Dice Buddies, has appeared on Enter the Hex, has written a course on game mastering, and is one of the writers of Guardinas of Umbra, a Savage Worlds setting. Dicebuddies.com.

Megan Hutchins

She regularly draws on her background in archeology when writing fiction. She's the author of YA fantasy novels The Redwood Palace and Drift. Her short fiction appears in Analog, Daily Science Fiction, Podcastle, Strange Horizons, and elsewhere. A long-time Idahoan, she now lives in Utah with her husband and four children. Mkhutchins.com.

Christopher Baxter

An author, editor, podcaster, and (why not) yes, a game designer. He shares stories and writing tips at writerinthehat.com and is host of A More Civilized Podcast.

Mike Holyoak

A lifelong geek obsessed with table-top RPGs, board games, and board game design. He is a three-time finalist of the SaltCon Ion Board Game Design Contest and one-time winner. Anubisnine.wordpress.com.

I'm working at keeping my material free of subscription charges by supplementing costs by being an Amazon Associate and having advertising appear. I earn a fee when people make purchases of qualified products from Amazon when they enter the site from a link on Guild Master Gaming and when people click on an ad. If you do either, thank you.

If you have a comment, suggestion, or critique please leave a comment here or send an email to guildmastergaming@gmail.com.

I have articles being published by others and you can find most of them on Guild Master Gaming on Facebookand Twitter(@GuildMstrGmng).



Thursday, March 5, 2020

Suzy Cube Update: March 23, 2018

#SuzyCube #gamedev #indiedev #madewithunity @NoodlecakeGames 
A very late and very short update...
Read more »

Super Adventures With The Xbox Game Pass, Part 3

This week on Super Adventures, I'm still writing about the games I played last November when I bought a month of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate. I'm up to part 3 now because it turns out you can play a lot of games in one month if you really rush. You probably shouldn't write about them though, because you likely won't have played them enough to come to grips with the gameplay or get a proper impression of the content.

But I'm doing it anyway because I want to show some games off and I'm hoping someone reading these will discover something new they end up playing and loving, even if I didn't love it myself.

You can find part 1 here: Part 1.
And part 2 is here: Part 2.

The final part is coming tomorrow!

Read on »

Here's What Happening On Xbox Game Pass For PC And Console This Month - Eurogamer

Here's what happening on Xbox Game Pass for PC and console this month

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Helping Kriel Company




Since I've been following what has been going on in CID, and given that I own both Khador and Legion, and love both Man-o-War and Blighted Ogrun, I did a lot of dojo over the last few months while I was out of actually playing the game. 

Now that I'm coming back to play Warmachine again and I've settled back on Trolls, there have been a few things I've noticed as a problem before I took my hiatus as well as the things that have changed for themes and list building in the newer themes that PP has designed.  Mostly this is to go over the few problems Trolls face in our themes, most of which is in Kriel Comapny.

Saving Horthol

One thing that other themes have been getting that Trolls lack is that generally their Dragoons count towards the free points.  Laddermore adds to the free points counter for Storm Division, Man-o-War Dragoons add to the counter for Man-o-War, etc. One thing that would be a huge quality of life improvement for Troll lists in both Band of Heroes and Storm of the North would be to change it so that rather than just Trollblood Units counted towards free points it could be "Trollblood Units and Dragoons" or just change it to call out the specific unit types to allow Horthol to count towards the points.

This would really be a quality of life improvement for list building and it would get Horthol back onto the table without severely hamstringing what can be taken in addition to the beasts for these unit heavy armies.

Fixing Kriel Company

Trolls have some very strong themes, but Kriel Company is by far our least represented theme force, and for good reasons: it is extremely restrictive.  The inability to take any of our beasts without a ranged attack, and thus no access to Rage outside of a Mountain King really changes what kinds of things our lists can play into.  This is a very frustrating turn of events since all of our heavies are effectively designed around having access to the Rage animus.  We pay a premium for access to ranged heavies because we can turn them into respectable melee threats.  The theme has little to no armor cracking unless you go down the Gargantuan route.

What is upsetting is that other factions "Ranged Only Themes" aren't similarly restricted: Sons of the Tempest and Winds of Death can still take their Centurions and Gladiators.  Trolls are pigeon holed in that our other themes effectively remove almost all of our ranged options especially ones with "legacy models" that formed the core of a lot of combined arms lists in MK2 and put them all into a single theme (SotN gives us two ranged units and one Battle Engine to make a combined arms list).  

It's also not as if our shooting options are inherently good or oppressive. Most if not all of them are fairly average at best, with short ranges across the board. They require specific caster support to be really effective – that's why our "ranged casters" are extremely powerful and synergistic and would be utterly broken if put into another faction (imagine either Grim or Gunny in Cygnar or Legion).

The 'official solution' for getting armor cracking in Kriel Company is to say that we should just take a Mountain King if we want Rage, but then we start working against what the theme wants to get benefits. Once you take the Mountain King you can't afford to take any other heavies without cutting into theme benefits elsewhere and the list suffers for it.

I believe there is a more elegant fix to Kriel Company's problems rather than just allowing Maulers to be taken or by giving something like the Blitzer Rage as a special animus in theme.  After all, putting Maulers into KC would make yet another theme where we take "Mauler + Other Heavy" and call it a day before moving on to taking the non-beast options that count towards the free points.

One theory is to make all Warbeasts, Battle Engines, and Units count towards the free points, but up the requirement for a "free" item to 30 points instead of 20.  This means KC will still max out at 3 free items, but taking a larger battlegroup or a Gargantuan isn't a huge loss.  I think this is warranted given that the theme doesn't have access to any of the really strong melee unit options that are available in Trolls.

It also gives us another theme that would allow more variety if we wanted more than just "Beast Points + 15" worth of Warbeasts without hamstringing the theme.  It's not as if Trolls have the fury management to make a seriously effective battlegroup based gunline like Legion or Skorne could, but even if we did we could just build that in Power of Dhunia and have access to Rage via a Mauler right now.  

If you wanted to play beasts and have them be powerful in melee you're still playing a "Gargantuan list" where the SR packet still favors multiple heavies vs. gargantuan/colossals.  You're still not taking lots of ranged units with our melee beatstick casters that don't support them because they're just not particularly effective without the support from our ranged focused casters.

Overall, I don't think this change breaks the game, or even makes Trolls particularly oppressive. It would just help get our ranged units and maybe even a War Wagon back onto the table vs. having us be a overly melee focused faction. 

Please PP, help make those units see the table!